The EDTP (Educator Preparation Program) Task 1 requires a comprehensive planning commentary demonstrating your understanding of effective lesson design. This isn't just about outlining your lesson; it's about showcasing your pedagogical reasoning and justifying every choice you make. This example will dissect a hypothetical lesson plan, illustrating how to write a compelling and insightful planning commentary that meets the rigorous standards of the EDTP.
Lesson Overview: Introducing Fractions through Hands-on Activities (4th Grade)
This lesson focuses on introducing the concept of fractions to fourth-grade students using a hands-on, manipulative-based approach. The central learning objective is for students to be able to identify, represent, and compare unit fractions (fractions with a numerator of 1).
Commentary Breakdown: Addressing the EDTP Rubric
A strong planning commentary directly addresses the criteria outlined in the EDTP rubric. We'll break down key areas and demonstrate how to effectively address them within the context of our sample lesson.
1. Learning Objectives and Alignment with Standards:
Commentary Example: "This lesson directly addresses the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics (CCSSM) 4.NF.A.1, which states that students should understand a fraction 1/b as the quantity formed by 1 part when a whole is partitioned into b equal parts. The learning objective—students will be able to identify, represent, and compare unit fractions—is explicitly aligned with this standard. This ensures that the lesson contributes meaningfully to the overall curriculum."
Explanation: This section clearly states the relevant standard and explicitly connects the learning objective to it. This isn't just a list; it's a demonstration of alignment.
2. Assessment Plan:
Commentary Example: "Formative assessment will occur throughout the lesson. Initial observation of student interactions with fraction circles will provide insight into pre-existing knowledge. During the group work, I will circulate and informally assess student understanding through questioning and observation of their representations. A summative assessment will involve students completing a worksheet requiring them to identify and compare unit fractions using both visual representations and numerical notation. This multi-faceted approach allows for a comprehensive understanding of student learning."
Explanation: The commentary details both formative and summative assessment methods. It highlights how these assessments will provide information on student understanding, directly addressing the need for evidence of student learning.
3. Instructional Strategies and Materials:
Commentary Example: "The lesson employs a constructivist approach, emphasizing hands-on learning. Fraction circles will be used as manipulatives, allowing students to visually represent and manipulate fractions. Group work encourages collaborative learning and peer-to-peer teaching. The use of real-world examples, such as sharing pizza slices, will help contextualize the concept of fractions. This multi-sensory approach caters to diverse learning styles and promotes deeper understanding."
Explanation: The commentary justifies the choice of instructional strategies. It explains why specific materials and methods are used, linking them back to the learning objective and addressing the needs of diverse learners.
4. Differentiation and Support:
Commentary Example: "Differentiation will be addressed through varied levels of support. Students who need additional support will work with a pre-selected partner who demonstrates mastery. They will also receive additional one-on-one assistance with the manipulatives. Students who demonstrate mastery early will be challenged with extension activities involving comparing fractions with different denominators. This tiered approach ensures that all students have access to appropriate learning experiences."
Explanation: This section explicitly details how differentiation is incorporated into the lesson, ensuring all learners are appropriately challenged and supported.
5. Lesson Flow and Pacing:
Commentary Example: "The lesson is structured to build upon students' prior knowledge of whole numbers. The introduction uses engaging visuals and real-world examples to build conceptual understanding. The group work provides a collaborative learning environment and allows for timely feedback. The summative assessment provides closure and ensures that students can apply their knowledge independently. The pacing is designed to allow sufficient time for each activity, based on projected student engagement and individual learning rates."
Explanation: This section demonstrates a clear understanding of lesson pacing and structure. It shows foresight and planning to anticipate student needs and adjust activities accordingly.
Conclusion: The Power of Justification
A strong EDTP Task 1 planning commentary goes beyond simply describing your lesson plan. It provides a detailed rationale for every decision, demonstrating your understanding of effective teaching practices and your commitment to student learning. By addressing each criterion of the rubric and providing thoughtful justifications, you showcase not only your lesson plan but also your pedagogical expertise. Remember to use specific examples and evidence to support your claims throughout your commentary. This approach builds a strong case for your understanding of effective lesson design.
